• Feedback
  • RIVM

Webbased Archive of RIVM Publications

Collection All
Listed communities

Webbased Archive of RIVM Publications > Articles and other publications by RIVM employees > Nutrition and Drinking Water > Classification of mineral water types and comparison with drinking water standards

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10029/11409
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!

Title: Classification of mineral water types and comparison with drinking water standards
Authors: Aa, NGFM van der
Citation: Environmental Geology (2003) 44:554–563
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Issue Date: 16-May-2003
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10029/11409
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-003-0791-4
Abstract: In a study of 291 mineral waters from 41 different countries, 9-20% exceeded the Dutch drinking water standards for chloride, calcium, magnesium, kalium, sodium, sulphate and fluorine. The mineral water quality cannot be qualified as bad since the standards for these compounds with the exception of fluorine, are not based on health effects but on undesirable taste effects and possible negative effects on the water supply system. For the mineral water data set the amount of dissolved compounds, hardness and chloride content appear to be the most distinctive criteria. A mineral water type classification based on these criteria will offer consumers a tool for assessing the mineral water on the basis of the chemical composition data on the bottle label. In terms of the criteria mentioned, average Dutch tap water strongly resembles the Belgian and Dutch mineral waters. This similarity does not extend to the price, since Dutch tap water is about 500 times cheaper.
Type: Article
Language: en
Appears in Collections:  Nutrition and Drinking Water

Files in This Item:
File Description Size Format View/Open
vanderaa.pdf424KbAdobe PDFThumbnail

All Items in WARP are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.