Current state and potential of hospitals for automated healthcare-associated infection surveillance: data from 24 European countries, 2022 to 2023
Rüther, Ferenc Darius Guedes, Mariana Presterl, Elisabeth Suetens, Carl Plachouras, Diamantis van Mourik, Maaike Sm van Rooden, Stephanie
Rüther, Ferenc Darius
Guedes, Mariana
Presterl, Elisabeth
Suetens, Carl
Plachouras, Diamantis
van Mourik, Maaike Sm
van Rooden, Stephanie
Series / Report no.
Open Access
Type
Journal Article
Article
Article
Language
en
Date of publication
2026-05
Year of publication
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Title
Current state and potential of hospitals for automated healthcare-associated infection surveillance: data from 24 European countries, 2022 to 2023
Translated Title
Published in
Euro Surveill 2026; 31(19):2500736
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Although electronic health records are increasingly used for automated surveillance (AS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), implementation is still a challenge. To develop more targeted implementation initiatives across Europe, knowledge about the current state of AS and potential to implement AS systems is needed.
AIM
To assess the adoption and feasibility of AS based on the 2022-2023 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Point Prevalence Survey (PPS).
METHODS
The 2022-2023 ECDC PPS included questions on the degree of AS and digital data storage for seven HAIs. Descriptive analyses of the responses were performed and stratified by geographic region and hospital characteristics. Categorical variables were analysed as such and converted to ordinal scales.
RESULTS
Overall, 992 hospitals from 24 European countries participated. Across all seven HAIs, fully manual surveillance was the most common method (from healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP) 38.8% to infection (CDI) 45.4%). A considerable proportion, i.e. 19.3% (HAP) to 29.8% (CDI), employed some form of automation (automated denominator 5.3-11.3%; semi-automated 12.2-16.9%; fully automated 1.8-2.9%). Many hospitals not employing AS had required source data digitally stored. Generally, tertiary hospitals had higher levels of automation and digital data storage compared with other hospital types. Smaller hospitals (≤ 250 beds) had lower levels of automation, but a similar level of digital data storage compared with larger hospitals.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights variability in AS implementation and digital potential across European hospitals and underscores the need for targeted strategies to advance AS adoption and optimise surveillance.