Hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia as a novel automated surveillance indicator: results from four European university hospitals, 2018 to 2022
Aghdassi, Seven JS van der Werff, Suzanne D Catho, Gaud Brekelmans, Manon Peña Diaz, Luis A Buetti, Niccolò Rüther, Ferenc D Teixeira, Daniel Sjöholm, Daniel Nauclér, Pontus
Aghdassi, Seven JS
van der Werff, Suzanne D
Catho, Gaud
Brekelmans, Manon
Peña Diaz, Luis A
Buetti, Niccolò
Rüther, Ferenc D
Teixeira, Daniel
Sjöholm, Daniel
Nauclér, Pontus
Series / Report no.
Open Access
Type
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Article
Language
en
Date of publication
2025-06-19
Year of publication
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Title
Hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia as a novel automated surveillance indicator: results from four European university hospitals, 2018 to 2022
Translated Title
Published in
Euro Surveill 2025; 30(24):2400613
Abstract
BACKGROUNDConventional manual surveillance of healthcare-associated infections is labour-intensive and therefore often restricted to areas with high-risk patients. Fully automated surveillance of hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia (HOB) may facilitate hospital-wide surveillance.AIMTo develop an algorithm and minimal dataset (MDS) required for automated surveillance of HOB and apply it to real-life routine data in four European hospitalsMETHODSThrough consensus discussion, a HOB definition with MDS suitable for automated surveillance was developed and applied in a retrospective multicentre observational study including all adult patients admitted to hospitals in the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland (2018-22). Annual HOB rates were calculated per 1,000 patient days for hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings.RESULTSHOB was defined as a positive blood culture with a recognised pathogen 2 or more days after hospital admission. For common commensals, two blood cultures with the same commensal within 2 days were required. HOB rates were comparable between the four hospitals (1.0-2.2/1,000 patient days). HOB rates were substantially higher in ICU than non-ICU settings, and HOB with common commensals accounted for 14.8-28.2% of all HOB. HOB rates per 1,000 patient days were consistent over time, but higher in 2020-21. HOB caused by comprised 8.4-16.0% of all HOB.CONCLUSIONAutomated HOB surveillance using a common definition was feasible and reproducible across four European hospitals. Future studies should investigate clinical relevance and preventability of HOB, and focus on strategies to make the automated HOB metric an actionable infection control tool.