Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAsselt MBA van
dc.contributor.authorMiddelkoop H
dc.contributor.authorKlooster SA van 't
dc.contributor.authorHaasnoot M
dc.contributor.authorDeursen WPA van
dc.contributor.authorGemert M van
dc.contributor.authorKwadijk JCJ
dc.contributor.authorBuiteveld H
dc.contributor.authorKonnen GP
dc.contributor.authorValkering P
dc.contributor.authorRotmans J
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-12T14:59:07Z
dc.date.available2012-12-12T14:59:07Z
dc.date.issued2001-12-10
dc.identifier410200081
dc.identifier.isbn90 5851 075 1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10029/257027
dc.description.abstractAbstract niet beschikbaar
dc.description.abstractWater management of the Rhine and Meuse is surrounded by major uncertainties. The central question is then: given the uncertainties, what is the best water management strategy? This raises the need for integrated scenarios that consider possible futures in a coherent and consistent way. In the present NRP project a scenario study was carried out in which physical modelling has been combined with socio-cultural theory. Existing climate, land use and socio-economic scenarios, as well as water management strategies have been structured using the Perspectives method. This resulted in integrated scenarios for water management, each representing a different view on the future, together with the according water management style. These were put in a scenario matrix with combinations of world views and management styles, both where these match and mis-match. Using a suite of existing modelling tools the implications of each scenario for the water systems were evaluated. Finally, a comparison of different water management styles under different possible futures was made, showing the risk, cost and benefits of different strategies.
dc.description.sponsorshipSG-NOP
dc.format.extent168 p
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUtrecht University
dc.publisherICIS Maastricht University
dc.publisherRIZA Lelystad
dc.publisherCarthago Consultancy
dc.publisherWLIdelft Hydraulics
dc.publisherKNMI De Bilt
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Change NOP-NRP report 410200081
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/410200081.html
dc.subject04nl
dc.subjectwaterbeheernl
dc.subjectrivierennl
dc.subjectmaasnl
dc.subjectrijnnl
dc.subjectscenario'snl
dc.subjecttoekomstnl
dc.subjectwater managementen
dc.subjectriversen
dc.subjectrhineen
dc.subjectmeuseen
dc.subjectscenarioen
dc.subjectfutureen
dc.titleIntegrated water management strategies for the Rhine and Meuse basins in a changing environmenten
dc.title.alternativeStrategieen voor een geintegreerd water management voor de Rijn en Maasnl
dc.typeReport
dc.contributor.departmentNOP
dc.date.updated2012-12-12T14:59:07Z
html.description.abstractAbstract niet beschikbaar
html.description.abstractWater management of the Rhine and Meuse is surrounded by major uncertainties. The central question is then: given the uncertainties, what is the best water management strategy? This raises the need for integrated scenarios that consider possible futures in a coherent and consistent way. In the present NRP project a scenario study was carried out in which physical modelling has been combined with socio-cultural theory. Existing climate, land use and socio-economic scenarios, as well as water management strategies have been structured using the Perspectives method. This resulted in integrated scenarios for water management, each representing a different view on the future, together with the according water management style. These were put in a scenario matrix with combinations of world views and management styles, both where these match and mis-match. Using a suite of existing modelling tools the implications of each scenario for the water systems were evaluated. Finally, a comparison of different water management styles under different possible futures was made, showing the risk, cost and benefits of different strategies.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record