• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • RIVM official reports
    • RIVM official reports
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • RIVM official reports
    • RIVM official reports
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    RIVM Publications RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Alternatieve in situ bodemsaneringstechnieken; literatuuronderzoek bij het project "In Situ Biorestauratie" Asten

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Scheuter AJ
    Type
    Report
    Language
    nl
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Title
    Alternatieve in situ bodemsaneringstechnieken; literatuuronderzoek bij het project "In Situ Biorestauratie" Asten
    Translated Title
    Other in situ bioremediation techniques; literature study in the framework of the project "In Situ Bioremediation" in Asten
    Publiekssamenvatting
    Aan de hand van literatuurgegevens zijn resultaten en kosten onderzocht van praktijksaneringen waarbij de bodem doorstroomd werd met lucht. De saneringstechnieken waarbij zuurstof via de lucht aan de bodem wordt toegevoerd, zijn bodemventilatie, bodemluchtextractie, bioventing en persluchtinjectie. Deze technieken werden vergeleken met het waterafgiftesysteem in Asten waarbij waterstofperoxyde toegepast is. De locaties, waarop deze technieken toegepast worden, zijn over het algemeen goed doorlaatbare zandgronden. De verontreiniging die zich op deze locaties bevond, besloeg het hele scala koolwaterstoffen. Uit de resultaten die in de literatuur gevonden werden, blijkt dat de saneringen over het algemeen zo'n twee jaar in bedrijf gehouden worden. In sommige gevallen worden hoge verwijderingssnelheden (tot ongeveer 20 mg.kg exp. -1 grond.dag exp. -1) bereikt. Nergens in de literatuur wordt vermeld dat de streefwaarden behaald konden worden. Bij de sanering in Asten zijn lagere restgehaltes behaald, maar na een langere saneringsduur. Deze locatie had waarschijnlijk ook gesaneerd kunnen worden met behulp van bioventing, waarbij de grondwaterspiegel verlaagd had moeten worden. Waarschijnlijk zou de saneringsduur korter zijn geweest omdat zuurstoflimitering een kleinere rol zou hebben gespeeld. Verwacht wordt echter dat de uiteindelijke restgehaltes hoger zouden liggen. Indien de kosten van de verschillende technieken onderling vergeleken worden, blijkt bioventing de meest kosteneffectieve saneringstechniek te zijn.
    In developing in situ remediation most of the focus used to be on techniques using infiltration water to supply oxygen to the location. Later, techniques were developed in which soil was flushed with air to enhance the oxygen availability to microorganisms. The aim of the study reported here was to examine the results of remediation where soil is flushed with air, as reported in the literature, and to examine the costs of such systems. In the study these techniques were compared with water-supply systems, particularly those using hydrogen peroxide, e.g. bioremediation in Asten (Noord-Brabant). The remediation techniques which use air to supply oxygen to the soil are soil ventilation, soil vapour extraction, bioventing and air sparging. Soil ventilation and soil vapor extraction are physical remediation techniques which can be employed only in the vadoze zone for removal of low molecular organic pollutants. Bioventing removes pollutants mainly by microbiological conversions in the vadoze zone. Air sparging can be employed only in the saturated zone, where the pollutants can be stripped by air, as well as converted by microorganisms. In general, these techniques are used on sandy soils, which are very permeable. The whole range of hydrocarbons can be remediated. According to the literature, remediations were generally kept in operation for two years. At some sites high removal rates, up to 20 mg.kg-1 soil.day-1, were reached. The literature did not mention anything about the remaining levels of pollution dropping to target-value level. Although sometimes only 5% of the original amount of pollution remains in the soil, the lowest levels obtained are found just below the former B value. Therefore, the remediation levels reached should always be viewed in connection with the remediation time and the amount of pollution originally present. At the remediation site in Asten, where a water-supply system with hydrogen peroxide dosing is used, lower remaining levels were obtained after a longer remediation time. This location could problably also be remediated using a bioventing technique if the groundwater table were lowered. The remediation time would probably be shorter because oxygen would be available to a greater extent. However, the final pollution levels in the soil are expected to be higher. Due to the lower soil-water content in the pores, the mineralization process would terminate earlier. It is possible that these results would not be obtained in the vicinity of the groundwater table. Another possibility might be natural attenuation after lowering the contamination levels with an active remediation technique. The Dutch target values can be expected to be attained, but only after a very long remediation time. Bioventing appears to be the most cost-effective remediation technique available.
    Sponsors
    DGM/Bo
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10029/261052
    Collections
    RIVM official reports

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.