The determination of arsenic in groundwater with graphite furnace AAS, hydride generation AAS and ICP-MS. A comparison using conventional linear regression and Deming regression analysis
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Type
ReportLanguage
en
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
The determination of arsenic in groundwater with graphite furnace AAS, hydride generation AAS and ICP-MS. A comparison using conventional linear regression and Deming regression analysisTranslated Title
[De bepaling van arseen in grondwater met grafietoven-AAS, hydride generatie AAS en ICP-MS. Een vergelijking met behulp van conventionele lineaire regressie analyse en Deming regressie analyse.]Publiekssamenvatting
Abstract niet beschikbaarIn this study four methods for the determination of arsenic in groundwater were compared. These methods were graphite furnace AAS, batch-hydride generation AAS, flow injection hydride generation AAS and ICP-MS. For hydride generation AAS four different sample preparation procedures were applied. The comparison was carried out using conventional linear regression and Deming linear regression. All methods performed about equal. Sample preparation for flow injection hydride generation could be simple. A prereduction step was sufficient. Detection limits were the lowest for batch hydride generation AAS while the measurement range was the largest for ICP-MS. Flow injection hydride generation AAS was the fastest method. A mathematical correction procedure for the interference of ArCl+ in the ICP-MS determination of arsenic was shown to be successful up to a chloride concentration of 100 mg/l.
Sponsors
RIVMCollections