Underreporting of meningococcal disease incidence in the Netherlands: results from a capture-recapture analysis based on three registration sources with correction for false positive diagnoses.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsGreeff, Sabine C de
Hoebe, Christian J P A
Nagelkerke, Nico J D
Melker, Hester E de
MetadataShow full item record
TitleUnderreporting of meningococcal disease incidence in the Netherlands: results from a capture-recapture analysis based on three registration sources with correction for false positive diagnoses.
PubliekssamenvattingIn order to come to a reliable evaluation of the effectiveness of the chosen vaccination policy regarding meningococcal disease, the completeness of registrations on meningococcal disease in the Netherlands was estimated with the capture-recapture method. Data over 1993-1998 were collected from (A) mandatory notifications (n = 2926); (B) hospital registration (n = 3968); (C) laboratory surveillance (n = 3484). As the standard capture-recapture method does not take into account false positive diagnoses, we developed a model to adjust for the lack of specificity of our sources. We estimated that 1363 cases were not registered in any of the three sources in the period of study. The completeness of the three sources was therefore estimated at 49% for source A, 67% for source B and 58% for source C. After adjustment for false positive diagnoses, the completeness of source A, B, and C was estimated as 52%, 70% and 62%, respectively. The capture-recapture methods offer an attractive approach to estimate the completeness of surveillance sources and hence contribute to a more accurate estimate of the disease burden under study. However, the method does not account for higher-order interactions or presence of false positive diagnoses. Being aware of these limitations, the capture-recapture method still elucidates the (in)completeness of sources and gives a rough estimate of this (in)completeness. This makes a more accurate monitoring of disease incidence possible and hence attributes to a more reliable foundation for the design and evaluation of health interventions such as vaccination programs.
- Invasive meningococcal disease in Austria 2002: assessment of completeness of notification by comparison of two independent data sources.
- Authors: Berghold C, Berghold A, Fülöp G, Heuberger S, Strauss R, Zenz W
- Issue date: 2006 Feb
- Declining incidence of meningococcal disease in Denmark, confirmed by a capture-recapture analysis for 1994 and 2002.
- Authors: Howitz MF, Samuelsson S, Mølbak K
- Issue date: 2008 Aug
- [Evaluation of the surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease in Tunisia: capture-recapture method].
- Authors: Bettaieb J, Bellali H, Ben Alaya N, Mrabet A, Kouni Chahed M
- Issue date: 2013 Sep-Oct
- Assessing the completeness of reporting of human immunodeficiency virus diagnoses in 2002-2003: capture-recapture methods.
- Authors: Hall HI, Song R, Gerstle JE 3rd, Lee LM, HIV/AIDS Reporting System Evaluation Group.
- Issue date: 2006 Aug 15
- Invasive meningococcal disease: completeness and timeliness of reporting of confirmed cases in Thames Valley, 2006-2007.
- Authors: Paranthaman K, Kent L, McCarthy N, Gray SJ
- Issue date: 2009 Dec