Tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yield of UK cigarettes and the risk of non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authorsvan Osch, Frits H M
Pauwels, Charlotte G G M
Jochems, Sylvia H J
James, Nicholas D
Wallace, D Michael A
Bryan, Richard T
van Schooten, Frederik J
Zeegers, Maurice P
MetadataShow full item record
TitleTar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yield of UK cigarettes and the risk of non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Published inEur J Cancer Prev 2017, advance online publication (ahead of print)
PubliekssamenvattingCigarette smoking is a major risk factor for bladder cancer (BC); however, the impact of cigarette content remains unclear. This study aims to investigate tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide (TNCO) yields of different filtered cigarettes in relation to BC risk. From the Bladder Cancer Prognosis Programme 575 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) cases, 139 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) cases and 130 BC-free controls with retrospective data on smoking behaviour and cigarette brand were identified. Independently measured TNCO yields of cigarettes sold in the UK were obtained through the UK Department of Health and merged with the Bladder Cancer Prognosis Programme dataset to estimate the daily intake of TNCO. BC risk increased by TNCO intake category for NMIBC cases (P <0.050 in all multivariate models), but only for the daily intake of tar for MIBC cases (P=0.046) in multivariate models. No difference in risk was observed between smokers of low-tar/low-nicotine and high-tar/high-nicotine cigarettes compared with never smokers, either for NMIBC (P=0.544) or MIBC (P=0.449). High daily intake of TNCO additionally increases the risk of both NMIBC and MIBC compared with low daily intake. However, as there is no difference in BC risk between low-tar/low-nicotine and high-tar/high-nicotine cigarette smokers, it remains unclear whether smoking behaviour or TNCO yield of cigarettes explains this association.
- Relative intakes of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide from cigarettes of different yields.
- Authors: Wald NJ, Boreham J, Bailey A
- Issue date: 1984 May
- Trends in tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields of UK cigarettes manufactured since 1934.
- Authors: Wald N, Doll R, Copeland G
- Issue date: 1981 Mar 7
- Reduction of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide intake in low tar smokers.
- Authors: Russell MA, Jarvis MJ, Feyerabend C, Saloojee Y
- Issue date: 1986 Mar
- Would a medium-nicotine, low-tar cigarette be less hazardous to health?
- Authors: Stepney R
- Issue date: 1981 Nov 14
- A comparison of the yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide of 36 brands of Canadian cigarettes tested under three conditions.
- Authors: Rickert WS, Robinson JC, Young JC, Collishaw NE, Bray DF
- Issue date: 1983 Sep