Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan Aar, Fleur
dc.contributor.authorvan Benthem, Birgit H B
dc.contributor.authorvan den Broek, Ingrid V F
dc.contributor.authorGötz, Hannelore M
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-16T09:04:09Z
dc.date.available2018-01-16T09:04:09Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-11
dc.identifier.citationSTIs in sex partners notified for chlamydia exposure: implications for expedited partner therapy. 2018 Sex Transm Infecten
dc.identifier.issn1472-3263
dc.identifier.pmid29326177
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/sextrans-2017-053364
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10029/621155
dc.description.abstractExpedited partner therapy (EPT) may reduce chlamydia reinfection rates. However, the disadvantages of EPT for chlamydia include missing the opportunity to test for other STIs and unnecessary use of antibiotics among non-infected partners. As part of a larger study that investigated the feasibility of EPT in the Netherlands, we explored the frequency of STI among a potential EPT target population of chlamydia-notified heterosexual men and women attending STI clinics for testing.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen
dc.titleSTIs in sex partners notified for chlamydia exposure: implications for expedited partner therapy.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalSex Transm Infect 2018; 94(8):619-21en
html.description.abstractExpedited partner therapy (EPT) may reduce chlamydia reinfection rates. However, the disadvantages of EPT for chlamydia include missing the opportunity to test for other STIs and unnecessary use of antibiotics among non-infected partners. As part of a larger study that investigated the feasibility of EPT in the Netherlands, we explored the frequency of STI among a potential EPT target population of chlamydia-notified heterosexual men and women attending STI clinics for testing.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record