A New Statistical Method to Determine the Degree of Validity of Health Economic Model Outcomes against Empirical Data.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Type
ArticleLanguage
en
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
A New Statistical Method to Determine the Degree of Validity of Health Economic Model Outcomes against Empirical Data.Published in
Value Health 2017; 20(8):1041-7Publiekssamenvatting
The validation of health economic (HE) model outcomes against empirical data is of key importance. Although statistical testing seems applicable, guidelines for the validation of HE models lack guidance on statistical validation, and actual validation efforts often present subjective judgment of graphs and point estimates.PMID
28964435ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.016
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Decision analytical economic modelling within a Bayesian framework: application to prophylactic antibiotics use for caesarean section.
- Authors: Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ, Abrams KR
- Issue date: 2002 Dec
- Validation of the Economic and Health Outcomes Model of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (ECHO-T2DM).
- Authors: Willis M, Johansen P, Nilsson A, Asseburg C
- Issue date: 2017 Mar
- AdViSHE: A Validation-Assessment Tool of Health-Economic Models for Decision Makers and Model Users.
- Authors: Vemer P, Corro Ramos I, van Voorn GA, Al MJ, Feenstra TL
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- Clinical significance not statistical significance: a simple Bayesian alternative to p values.
- Authors: Burton PR, Gurrin LC, Campbell MJ
- Issue date: 1998 May
- Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
- Authors: Sullivan SD, Mauskopf JA, Augustovski F, Jaime Caro J, Lee KM, Minchin M, Orlewska E, Penna P, Rodriguez Barrios JM, Shau WY
- Issue date: 2014 Jan-Feb