A novel concept in ground water quality management: Towards function specific screening values.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
TitleA novel concept in ground water quality management: Towards function specific screening values.
Published inWater Res 2017; 119:187-200
PubliekssamenvattingThis paper is meant to initiate and feed the discussion on a more sophisticated procedure for the derivation and use of groundwater screening values (GSVs). To this purpose, the possibilities and tools for the derivation of function specific GSVs, i.e., GSVs that depend on the actual contact of humans and ecosystems with groundwater and groundwater-related mediums, are elaborated in this study. Application of GSVs geared to the specific use and function of specific groundwater volumes could result in a more effective and cost-efficient groundwater quality management, without compromising the protection of human health and the ecosystem. Therefore, a procedure to derive function specific GSVs was developed. For illustrative purposes, risk limits have been derived for human health and ecological protection targets, for arsenic, benzene, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and vinylchloride. Agriculture and Nature reserves (combined), Residential and Industrial land uses have been considered and two different groundwater management purposes, i.e., curative and sustainable groundwater management. For each of the four contaminants, this results in a series of risks limits for each function and land use combination. It is shown that for all four contaminants higher groundwater screening values are considered appropriate for less sensitive combinations of function and land use. In the process towards (policy) implementation of these function specific GSV, it is recommended to evaluate the selection of protection targets, the scientific basis of the risk assessment procedures applied and the methodology to assess the time factor for groundwater quality assessment, given the fact that groundwater is a dynamic medium. Moreover, protection levels must be harmonized with national or regional groundwater quality standards and correspond with the requirements of the Groundwater Daughter Directive of the European Union Water Framework Directive. Groundwater plumes that are judged as 'no need for remediation' are not compatible with the Water Framework Directive requirement to take actions to prevent or limit inputs of contaminants, even when no receptor is present. However, the European Commission formulated a series of exemptions, to avoid that the "prevent" requirement would imply an onerous and sometimes unfeasible task. The function specific GSVs derived in this study could be used to identify the groundwater volumes that do not result in an unacceptable risk.
- European case studies supporting the derivation of natural background levels and groundwater threshold values for the protection of dependent ecosystems and human health.
- Authors: Hinsby K, Condesso de Melo MT, Dahl M
- Issue date: 2008 Aug 15
- Groundwater quality trend and trend reversal assessment in the European Water Framework Directive context: an example with nitrates in Italy.
- Authors: Frollini E, Preziosi E, Calace N, Guerra M, Guyennon N, Marcaccio M, Menichetti S, Romano E, Ghergo S
- Issue date: 2021 May
- Review of quantitative surveys of the length and stability of MTBE, TBA, and benzene plumes in groundwater at UST sites.
- Authors: Connor JA, Kamath R, Walker KL, McHugh TE
- Issue date: 2015 Mar-Apr
- Evaluating the risks of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) pollution of urban groundwater.
- Authors: Chisala BN, Tait NG, Lerner DN
- Issue date: 2007 Apr 1
- Remediation of groundwater contaminated with MTBE and benzene: the potential of vertical-flow soil filter systems.
- Authors: van Afferden M, Rahman KZ, Mosig P, De Biase C, Thullner M, Oswald SE, Müller RA
- Issue date: 2011 Oct 15