• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Articles and other publications by RIVM employees
    • Miscellaneous
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Articles and other publications by RIVM employees
    • Miscellaneous
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    RIVM Publications RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Rapid Assessment of Stakeholder Concerns about Public Health. An Introduction to a Fast and Inexpensive Approach Applied on Health Concerns about Intensive Animal Production Systems.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    ijerph-14-01534.pdf
    Size:
    1.061Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Marleen
    van der Ree, Joost
    Lebret, Erik
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Title
    Rapid Assessment of Stakeholder Concerns about Public Health. An Introduction to a Fast and Inexpensive Approach Applied on Health Concerns about Intensive Animal Production Systems.
    Published in
    Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(12):1534
    Publiekssamenvatting
    To effectively manage environmental health risks, stakeholders often need to act collectively. Stakeholders vary in their desire to act due to many factors, such as knowledge, risk perception, interests, and worldviews. Understanding their perceptions of the issues at stake is crucial to support the risk governance process. Even though concern assessment is a pivotal element of risk governance, few tools for rapid assessment are reported in the literature. We tested a rapid and relatively cheap approach, taking the Dutch debate on Intensive Animal Production Systems (IAPS) and health as an example. Dutch policy-oriented publications on IAPS and health and ten semi-structured in-depth interviews with a variety of stakeholders were analyzed to identify stakeholders and concerns involved in the Dutch debate about IAPS and health. Concerns were mapped and a stakeholder network was derived. Three classes of concerns were recognized in the discussions about IAPS and health: concerns related to health risks, concerns regarding the activity causing the risks (IAPS), and concerns about the process to control the risks. The notions of 'trust' and 'scientific uncertainty' appeared as important themes in the discussions. Argumentation based on concerns directly related to health risks, the activity causing the risk (IAPS), and its risk management can easily become muddled up in a societal debate, limiting the development of effective action perspectives. Acknowledging these multiple stakeholder concerns can clarify the positions taken by stakeholders and allow for more and other action perspectives to develop.
    DOI
    10.3390/ijerph14121534
    PMID
    29232902
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10029/621664
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.3390/ijerph14121534
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Miscellaneous

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Risk perceptions of public health and food safety hazards in poultry husbandry by citizens, poultry farmers and poultry veterinarians.
    • Authors: van Asselt M, Poortvliet PM, Ekkel ED, Kemp B, Stassen EN
    • Issue date: 2018 Feb 1
    • Ugandan stakeholder hopes and concerns about gene drive mosquitoes for malaria control: new directions for gene drive risk governance.
    • Authors: Hartley S, Smith RDJ, Kokotovich A, Opesen C, Habtewold T, Ledingham K, Raymond B, Rwabukwali CB
    • Issue date: 2021 Mar 16
    • Intensive Livestock Farming and Residential Health: Experts' Views.
    • Authors: Eijrond V, Claassen L, van der Giessen J, Timmermans D
    • Issue date: 2019 Sep 27
    • Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    • Authors: Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S
    • Issue date: 2003 Nov-Dec
    • Assessing ethics and animal welfare in animal biotechnology for farm production.
    • Authors: Kaiser M
    • Issue date: 2005 Apr

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.