• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Articles and other publications by RIVM employees
    • Miscellaneous
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Articles and other publications by RIVM employees
    • Miscellaneous
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of WARPCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherDepartmentThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Patiënten en dokters makens samen een onderzoeksagenda ; De methode van de Britse James Lind Alliance.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Schoemaker, C G
    Prakken, A B J
    Furth, E F
    Type
    Article
    Language
    nl
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Title
    Patiënten en dokters makens samen een onderzoeksagenda ; De methode van de Britse James Lind Alliance.
    Published in
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskde 2017; 161:D1764
    Publiekssamenvatting
    The British James Lind Alliance (JLA) has developed a method to allow practitioners, patients and family members together to develop a research agenda for a disease or a form of treatment. In a 'priority setting partnership', they gradually establish a top-10 list of the most important unanswered research questions. Input from patients and their relatives is given the same weight when determining priorities as that from practitioners. More than 50 of these top-10 lists have been created so far, one of which was created in the Netherlands. The JLA method combines elements of the two very different methods currently prevailing in the Netherlands: the dialog model, developed by the VU and the 'health care evaluation agenda', developed by the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists. The JLA method is quite practicable and leads to new research questions. The biggest advantage is that it leads to a dialogue between creators and users of knowledge about what the relevant research questions are.
    PMID
    29192570
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10029/621725
    Collections
    Miscellaneous

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Dutch juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients, carers and clinicians create a research agenda together following the James Lind Alliance method: a study protocol.
    • Authors: Schoemaker CG, Armbrust W, Swart JF, Vastert SJ, van Loosdregt J, Verwoerd A, Whiting C, Cowan K, Olsder W, Versluis E, van Vliet R, Fernhout MJ, Bookelman SL, Cappon J, van den Berg JM, Schatorjé E, Muller PCEH, Kamphuis S, de Boer J, Lelieveld OTHM, van der Net J, Jongsma KR, van Rensen A, Dedding C, Wulffraat NM
    • Issue date: 2018 Sep 15
    • Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership.
    • Authors: Madden M, Morley R
    • Issue date: 2016
    • Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis.
    • Authors: Rowbotham NJ, Smith SJ, Elliott ZC, Leighton PA, Rayner OC, Morley R, Smyth AR
    • Issue date: 2019
    • Dementia priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance: using patient and public involvement and the evidence base to inform the research agenda.
    • Authors: Kelly S, Lafortune L, Hart N, Cowan K, Fenton M, Brayne C, Dementia Priority Setting Partnership.
    • Issue date: 2015 Nov
    • Patients', clinicians' and the research communities' priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch.
    • Authors: Crowe S, Fenton M, Hall M, Cowan K, Chalmers I
    • Issue date: 2015

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.