How to Measure Population Health: An Exploration Toward an Integration of Valid and Reliable Instruments.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
TitleHow to Measure Population Health: An Exploration Toward an Integration of Valid and Reliable Instruments.
Published inPopul Health Manag 2018; 21(4):323-30
PubliekssamenvattingPopulation health management initiatives are introduced to transform health and community services by implementing interventions that combine various services and address the continuum of health and well-being of populations. Insight is required into a population's health to evaluate implementation of these initiatives. This study aims to determine the performance of commonly used instruments for measuring a population's experienced health and explores the assessed concepts of population health. Survey-based Short Form 12, version 2 (SF12, health status), Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM13), and Kessler 10 (K10, psychological distress) data of 3120 respondents was used. Floor/ceiling effects were studied using descriptive statistics. Validity was assessed using factor and discriminant analyses, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach α. Finally, to study covered concepts, exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) were conducted, which included additional surveyed characteristics. The SF12 and PAM13 sum scores showed acceptable averages and distributions, while results of the K10 indicated a floor effect. SF12 and K10 measured their expected constructs, while PAM13 did not. The EFA of PAM13 displayed 1 instead of the expected 4 constructs. Reliability was good for all instruments (α 0.89-0.93). The overall EFA identified 4 concepts: mental, physical ability, lifestyle, and self-management. SF12 and PAM13, combined with lifestyle characteristics, are shown to provide insightful information to measure the physical, mental, lifestyle, and self-management concepts of population health. Future research should include additional instruments that cover new aspects introduced by recent definitions of health.
- Comparing the Health of Populations: Methods to Evaluate and Tailor Population Management Initiatives in the Netherlands.
- Authors: Hendrikx RJP, Drewes HW, Spreeuwenberg M, Ruwaard D, Baan CA
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Measuring patient activation in Italy: Translation, adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the patient activation measure 13 (PAM13-I).
- Authors: Graffigna G, Barello S, Bonanomi A, Lozza E, Hibbard J
- Issue date: 2015 Dec 23
- Validation of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in the 2012 Aboriginal Peoples Survey.
- Authors: Bougie E, Arim RG, Kohen DE, Findlay LC
- Issue date: 2016 Jan 20
- Reliability and validity of 12-item Short-Form health survey (SF-12) for the health status of Chinese community elderly population in Xujiahui district of Shanghai.
- Authors: Shou J, Ren L, Wang H, Yan F, Cao X, Wang H, Wang Z, Zhu S, Liu Y
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- The Kessler psychological distress scale: translation and validation of an Arabic version.
- Authors: Easton SD, Safadi NS, Wang Y, Hasson RG 3rd
- Issue date: 2017 Oct 27