How psychological distance of a study sample in discrete choice experiments affects preference measurement: a colorectal cancer screening case study.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Veldwijk, JorienGroothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G M
Kihlbom, Ulrik
Langenskiöld, Sophie
Dekker, Evelien
Kallenberg, Frank G J
de Wit, G Ardine
Lambooij, Mattijs S
Type
ArticleLanguage
en
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
How psychological distance of a study sample in discrete choice experiments affects preference measurement: a colorectal cancer screening case study.Published in
Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:272-82PMID
30863017ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2147/PPA.S180994
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
- Authors: Veldwijk J, Essers BA, Lambooij MS, Dirksen CD, Smit HA, de Wit GA
- Issue date: 2016 Mar-Apr
- Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review.
- Authors: Brinkmann M, Fricke LM, Diedrich L, Robra BP, Krauth C, Dreier M
- Issue date: 2022 Sep 22
- Older adults' preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice.
- Authors: Kistler CE, Hess TM, Howard K, Pignone MP, Crutchfield TM, Hawley ST, Brenner AT, Ward KT, Lewis CL
- Issue date: 2015
- Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
- Authors: Veldwijk J, Smith IP, Oliveri S, Petrocchi S, Smith MY, Lanzoni L, Janssens R, Huys I, de Wit GA, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
- Issue date: 2024 Feb
- Using a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North Carolina.
- Authors: Pignone MP, Crutchfield TM, Brown PM, Hawley ST, Laping JL, Lewis CL, Lich KH, Richardson LC, Tangka FK, Wheeler SB
- Issue date: 2014 Nov 30