Regulating human safety: How dose selection in toxicity studies impacts human health hazard assessment and subsequent risk management options.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Type
ArticleLanguage
en
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
Regulating human safety: How dose selection in toxicity studies impacts human health hazard assessment and subsequent risk management options.Published in
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2020; 114:104660PMID
32334039ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104660
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Use of the kinetically-derived maximum dose concept in selection of top doses for toxicity studies hampers proper hazard assessment and risk management.
- Authors: Heringa MB, Cnubben NHP, Slob W, Pronk MEJ, Muller A, Woutersen M, Hakkert BC
- Issue date: 2020 Jul
- ECETOC Florence workshop on risk assessment of endocrine substances, including the potency concept.
- Authors: Fegert I
- Issue date: 2013 Dec 16
- Optimising testing strategies for classification of human health and environmental hazards - A proof-of-concept study.
- Authors: Da Silva E, Baun A, Berggren E, Worth A
- Issue date: 2020 Dec 15
- Identification, assessment and management of "endocrine disruptors" in wildlife in the EU substance legislation--discussion paper from the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA).
- Authors: Frische T, Bachmann J, Frein D, Juffernholz T, Kehrer A, Klein A, Maack G, Stock F, Stolzenberg HC, Thierbach C, Walter-Rohde S
- Issue date: 2013 Dec 16
- Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
- Authors: Ahlers J, Stock F, Werschkun B
- Issue date: 2008 Oct