Adhering to the 2017 Dutch Physical Activity Guidelines: A Trend over Time 2001-2018.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Type
ArticleLanguage
en
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
Adhering to the 2017 Dutch Physical Activity Guidelines: A Trend over Time 2001-2018.Published in
Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(3):681PMID
31973048ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/ijerph17030681
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- The SQUASH was a more valid tool than the OBiN for categorizing adults according to the Dutch physical activity and the combined guideline.
- Authors: de Hollander EL, Zwart L, de Vries SI, Wendel-Vos W
- Issue date: 2012 Jan
- Are Canadians meeting the guidelines for moderate and vigorous leisure-time physical activity?
- Authors: Bryan SN, Katzmarzyk PT
- Issue date: 2009 Aug
- "Are Thai children and youth sufficiently active? prevalence and correlates of physical activity from a nationally representative cross-sectional study".
- Authors: Amornsriwatanakul A, Lester L, Bull FC, Rosenberg M
- Issue date: 2017 May 30
- The impact of area-based initiatives on physical activity trends in deprived areas; a quasi-experimental evaluation of the Dutch District Approach.
- Authors: Kramer D, Droomers M, Jongeneel-Grimen B, Wingen M, Stronks K, Kunst AE
- Issue date: 2014 Mar 11
- Domain and intensity of physical activity are associated with metabolic syndrome: A population-based study.
- Authors: Serrano-Sánchez JA, Fernández-Rodríguez MJ, Sanchis-Moysi J, Rodríguez-Pérez MDC, Marcelino-Rodríguez I, Cabrera de León A
- Issue date: 2019