Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Rooij, Doret
dc.contributor.authorBelfroid, Evelien
dc.contributor.authorEilers, Renske
dc.contributor.authorRoßkamp, Dorothee
dc.contributor.authorSwaan, Corien
dc.contributor.authorTimen, Aura
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-16T20:00:12Z
dc.date.available2020-08-16T20:00:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.identifier.issn2314-6141
dc.identifier.pmid32090099
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2020/5861894
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10029/624140
dc.description.abstractA qualitative three-step study among infectious disease prevention and control experts was performed. First, interviews (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleQualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalBiomed Res Int 2020; Article ID 5861894en_US
dc.source.journaltitleBioMed research international


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record