Choosing the best for preventing the worst: A structured analysis of the selection of risk management options in REACH restriction dossiers.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Type
ArticleLanguage
en
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
Choosing the best for preventing the worst: A structured analysis of the selection of risk management options in REACH restriction dossiers.Published in
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2020; 118:104809PMID
33122044ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104809
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Socio-economic analysis in REACH restriction dossiers for chemicals management: A critical review.
- Authors: Gabbert S, Hilber I
- Issue date: 2020 Aug
- Comparison of methods for calculating the health costs of endocrine disrupters: a case study on triclosan.
- Authors: Prichystalova R, Fini JB, Trasande L, Bellanger M, Demeneix B, Maxim L
- Issue date: 2017 Jun 9
- Time matters: A stock-pollution approach to authorisation decision-making for PBT/vPvB chemicals under REACH.
- Authors: Gabbert S, Hilber I
- Issue date: 2016 Dec 1
- Identification, assessment and management of "endocrine disruptors" in wildlife in the EU substance legislation--discussion paper from the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA).
- Authors: Frische T, Bachmann J, Frein D, Juffernholz T, Kehrer A, Klein A, Maack G, Stock F, Stolzenberg HC, Thierbach C, Walter-Rohde S
- Issue date: 2013 Dec 16
- PBT assessment using the revised annex XIII of REACH: a comparison with other regulatory frameworks.
- Authors: Moermond CT, Janssen MP, de Knecht JA, Montforts MH, Peijnenburg WJ, Zweers PG, Sijm DT
- Issue date: 2012 Apr