Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHilber, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorGabbert, Silke
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-30T13:01:58Z
dc.date.available2020-12-30T13:01:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-26
dc.identifier.pmid33122044
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104809
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10029/624613
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectCriteria matrixen_US
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.subjectDecision supporten_US
dc.subjectLogistic regressionen_US
dc.subjectPrincipal component analysisen_US
dc.subjectREACHen_US
dc.subjectRestriction processen_US
dc.subjectRisk management optionsen_US
dc.subjectSocio-economic analysisen_US
dc.titleChoosing the best for preventing the worst: A structured analysis of the selection of risk management options in REACH restriction dossiers.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0295
dc.identifier.journalRegul Toxicol Pharmacol 2020; 118:104809en_US
dc.source.journaltitleRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
dc.source.volume118
dc.source.beginpage104809
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryNetherlands


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record