Comparison of analytical techniques for dynamic trace metal speciation in natural freshwaters.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Sigg, LauraBlack, Frank
Buffle, Jacques
Cao, Jun
Cleven, Rob
Davison, William
Galceran, Josep
Gunkel, Peggy
Kalis, Erwin
Kistler, David
Martin, Michel
Noël, Stéphane
Nur, Yusuf
Odzak, Niksa
Puy, Jaume
Riemsdijk, Willem van
Temminghoff, Erwin
Tercier-Waeber, Mary-Lou
Toepperwien, Stefanie
Town, Raewyn M
Unsworth, Emily R
Warnken, Kent W
Weng, Liping
Xue, Hanbin
Zhang, Hao
Type
ArticleLanguage
en
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
Comparison of analytical techniques for dynamic trace metal speciation in natural freshwaters.Publiekssamenvatting
Several techniques for speciation analysis of Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, and Ni are used in freshwater systems and compared with respect to their performance and to the metal species detected. The analytical techniques comprise the following: (i) diffusion gradients in thin-film gels (DGT); (ii) gel integrated microelectrodes combined to voltammetric in situ profiling system (GIME-VIP); (iii) stripping chronopotentiometry (SCP); (iv) flow-through and hollow fiber permeation liquid membranes (FTPLM and HFPLM); (v) Donnan membrane technique (DMT); (vi) competitive ligand-exchange/stripping voltammetry (CLE-SV). All methods could be used both under hardwater and under softwater conditions, although in some cases problems with detection limits were encountered at the low total concentrations. The detected Cu, Cd, and Pb concentrations decreased in the order DGT > or = GIME-VIP > or = FTPLM > or = HFPLM approximately = DMT (>CLE-SV for Cd), detected Zn decreased as DGT > or = GIME-VIP and Ni as DGT > DMT, in agreement with the known dynamic features of these techniques. Techniques involving in situ measurements (GIME-VIP) or in situ exposure (DGT, DMT, and HFPLM) appear to be appropriate in avoiding artifacts which may occur during sampling and sample handling.PMID
16570618Collections
Related articles
- Model predictions of metal speciation in freshwaters compared to measurements by in situ techniques.
- Authors: Unsworth ER, Warnken KW, Zhang H, Davison W, Black F, Buffle J, Cao J, Cleven R, Galceran J, Gunkel P, Kalis E, Kistler D, Van Leeuwen HP, Martin M, Noël S, Nur Y, Odzak N, Puy J, Van Riemsdijk W, Sigg L, Temminghoff E, Tercier-Waeber ML, Toepperwien S, Town RM, Weng L, Xue H
- Issue date: 2006 Mar 15
- Key role of the sorption process in alteration of metal and metalloid quantification by fouling development on DGT passive samplers.
- Authors: Devillers D, Buzier R, Grybos M, Charriau A, Guibaud G
- Issue date: 2017 Nov
- Evaluation of the Chemcatcher and DGT passive samplers for monitoring metals with highly fluctuating water concentrations.
- Authors: Allan IJ, Knutsson J, Guigues N, Mills GA, Fouillac AM, Greenwood R
- Issue date: 2007 Jul
- Chemcatcher and DGT passive sampling devices for regulatory monitoring of trace metals in surface water.
- Authors: Allan IJ, Knutsson J, Guigues N, Mills GA, Fouillac AM, Greenwood R
- Issue date: 2008 Jul
- Evaluation of the diffusive gradient in a thin film technique for monitoring trace metal concentrations in estuarine waters.
- Authors: Dunn RJ, Teasdale PR, Warnken J, Schleich RR
- Issue date: 2003 Jun 15