Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of the Boston University Approach to Psychiatric Rehabilitation for Increasing the Social Participation of Individuals With Severe Mental Illnesses.

Sanches, Sarita AFeenstra, Talitha LSwildens, Wilma Evan Busschbach, Jooske Tvan Weeghel, Jaapvan Asselt, Thea D I2022-06-292022-06-292022-05-261664-06403572257810.3389/fpsyt.2022.880482http://hdl.handle.net/10029/625878In a randomized clinical trial with 188 individuals with SMIs, BPR (n = 98) was compared to ACC (n = 90). Costs were assessed with the Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders (TIC-P). Outcome measures for the cost-effectiveness analysis were incremental cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) and incremental cost per proportional change in social participation. Budget Impact was investigated using four implementation scenarios and two costing variants.enCopyright © 2022 Sanches, Feenstra, Swildens, van Busschbach, van Weeghel and van Asselt.Boston University Approach to Psychiatric RehabilitationQALYbudget impactcost-effectivenessquality of lifesevere mental illnesssocial participationCost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of the Boston University Approach to Psychiatric Rehabilitation for Increasing the Social Participation of Individuals With Severe Mental Illnesses.ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry 2022 May 26;13:880482