Stone, VickiMiller, Mark RClift, Martin J DElder, AlisonMills, Nicholas LMøller, PeterSchins, Roel P FVogel, UllaKreyling, Wolfgang GAlstrup Jensen, KeldKuhlbusch, Thomas A JSchwarze, Per EHoet, PeterPietroiusti, AntonioDe Vizcaya-Ruiz, AndreaBaeza-Squiban, ArmelleTeixeira, João PauloTran, C LangCassee, Flemming R2018-03-082018-03-082017Nanomaterials Versus Ambient Ultrafine Particles: An Opportunity to Exchange Toxicology Knowledge. 2017, 125 (10):106002 Environ. Health Perspect.1552-99242901798710.1289/EHP424http://hdl.handle.net/10029/621568A rich body of literature exists that has demonstrated adverse human health effects following exposure to ambient air particulate matter (PM), and there is strong support for an important role of ultrafine (nanosized) particles. At present, relatively few human health or epidemiology data exist for engineered nanomaterials (NMs) despite clear parallels in their physicochemical properties and biological actions inin vitromodels.enArchived with thanks to Environmental health perspectivesAir PollutantsEnvironmental ExposureHumansNanostructuresParticulate MatterNanomaterials Versus Ambient Ultrafine Particles: An Opportunity to Exchange Toxicology Knowledge.ArticleEnviron Health Perspect 2017; 125(10):106002