• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • RIVM official reports
    • RIVM official reports
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • RIVM official reports
    • RIVM official reports
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    RIVM Publications RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Voortgangsrapportage Evaluatie SaneringsUrgentieSystematiek; Knelpuntenanalyse en verkenning oplossingsrichtingen

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    711701033.pdf
    Size:
    535.1Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Lijzen JPA
    Otte PF
    Kovar K
    Swartjes FA
    Bloemen H
    Hoogendoorn E
    Krystek P
    Ritsema R
    Rompelberg C
    Verschoor A
    Series/Report no.
    RIVM rapport 711701033
    Type
    Report
    Language
    nl
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Title
    Voortgangsrapportage Evaluatie SaneringsUrgentieSystematiek; Knelpuntenanalyse en verkenning oplossingsrichtingen
    Translated Title
    Progress report on the Evaluation of the Dutch method to determine urgency of soil remediation; analysis of restraints and exploration of possible solutions
    Publiekssamenvatting
    The Remediation Urgency Method (SUS), a method in the Netherlands to determine the urgency of soil remediation, was introduced in 1994 to prioritise the remediation of contaminated sites in the Netherlands. The methodology is based on human and ecological risk assessment and risks of contaminant migration. Here, the analysis of the restraints in the method are described, focusing on the site-specific risk assessment for humans and contaminant migration. Restraints were established on the basis of interviews with experts and earlier evaluations of the method. Based on the restraints found and estimates on scientific feasibility, options for possible solutions have been prioritised. Besides this, an initial exploration of solutions has been undertaken for some options. For human risk assessment, exploration focused on estimating the oral bioavailability of soil contaminants, and measuring the concentrations in consumption crops and indoor air. A risk assessment framework was developed for risk of contaminant migration, and a tool to assess the leaching of contaminants in the (unsaturated) soil was explored. Studies to improve the site-specific risk assessment of soil contamination are continuing in 2003 and 2004. These focus on overcoming the identified restraints and exploring solutions with a high priority.
    De SaneringsUrgentieSystematiek (SUS) is in 1994 ontwikkeld om de urgentie van ernstige gevallen van bodemverontreiniging te bepalen. De methode is gebaseerd op risico's voor de mens, voor ecosystemen en verspreiding van verontreiniging. Het rapport behandelt de knelpuntenanalyse van de locatiespecifieke humane risicobeoordeling en de beoordeling van verspreidingsrisico's. Op bases van interviews met deskundigen en resultaten van eerder uitgevoerde evaluaties zijn de belangrijkste knelpunten benoemd en zijn oplossingsrichtingen aangegeven en geprioriteerd, mede op basis van wetenschappelijke haalbaarheid. Naast deze analyse zijn enkele verkenningen van oplossingsrichtingen en mogelijke verbeteringen uitgevoerd. Voor de humane risicobeoordeling is ingegaan op het bepalen van de orale biobeschikbaarheid, het meten van concentraties in gewas en het meten van binnenlucht concentraties. Voor de beoordeling van verspreidingsrisico's is een raamwerk voor beoordeling opgesteld en is een studie uitgevoerd naar een methode voor beoordeling van uitloging in de onverzadigde bodem. Onderzoek naar de verbetering van de locatiespecifieke risicobeoordeling van bodemverontreiniging zal zich in 2003 met name richten op de oplossingsrichtingen waaraan een hoge prioriteit is toegekend.
    Publisher
    Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu RIVM
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10029/9066
    Collections
    RIVM official reports

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.